Quote from: saxydev on Today at 05:13:23 AM

?

Quote

Full application of the EU AML/CFT rules to the crypto sector
At present, only certain categories of crypto-asset service providers are included in the scope of EU
AML/CFT rules. The proposed reform will extend these rules to the entire crypto sector, obliging all
service providers to conduct due diligence on their customers. Today's amendments will ensure full
traceability of crypto-asset transfers, such as Bitcoin, and will allow for prevention and detection of
their possible use for money laundering or terrorism financing. In addition, anonymous crypto asset
wallets will be prohibited, fully applying EU AML/CFT rules to the crypto sector.

sexy?

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1596452256370&uri=CELEX:52020DC0605
https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/aml-ctf-lawyers-training-manuals_en
https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/210720-anti-money-laundering-countering-financing-terrorism_en#transfer (this is revision of a treaty)
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX%3A32014L0042&qid=1541682532524&from=EN

Thank you for showing me you know how to use google...
The first paragraph is no law, in case you didn't know that.

The first link:
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1596452256370&uri=CELEX:52020DC0605
Is a briefing, you can see large in bold letters "communication"

The second link:
https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/aml-ctf-lawyers-training-manuals_en
Is a training manual for lawyers, probably it will come to a surprise for you but all that is for criminal cases, aka things that are being solved in a court

The third link:
https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/210720-anti-money-laundering-countering-financing-terrorism_en#transfer (this is revision of a treaty)
Yup, it's revision:

Quote

The AML authority should be operational in 2024 and will start the work of direct supervision slightly later, once the directive has been transposed and the new rules start to apply.

So openchange uses laws from the future just like you, nicely done

The fourth link:
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX%3A32014L0042&qid=1541682532524&from=EN

Finally, let's see some laws:

Quote

(1) The main motive for cross-border organised crime, including mafia-type criminal organisation, is financial gain. As
a consequence, competent authorities should be given the means to trace, freeze, manage and confiscate the
proceeds of crime.

Neither you nor openchange are competent authorities

Quote

) In the confiscation of instrumentalities and proceeds of crime following a final decision of a court and of property
of equivalent value to those instrumentalities and proceeds, the broad concept of criminal offences covered by this
Directive should apply. Framework Decision 2001/500/JHA requires Member States to enable the confiscation of
instrumentalities and proceeds of crime following a final conviction and to enable the confiscation of property the
value of which corresponds to such instrumentalities and proceeds.

Neither you nor openchange are a court so your final decision means nothing

Quote

Confiscation leads to the final deprivation of property. However, preservation of property can be a prerequisite to
confiscation and can be of importance for the enforcement of a confiscation order. Property is preserved by means
of freezing. In order to prevent the dissipation of property before a freezing order can be issued, the competent
authorities in the Member States should be empowered to take immediate action in order to secure such property.

Has openchange offered support to the competent authority to preserve the funds, do they have a court order mandating a confiscation order?

And the final sexy paragraph:

Quote

(34) The purpose of communicating the freezing order is, inter alia, to allow the affected person to challenge the order.
Therefore, such communication should indicate, at least briefly, the reason or reasons for the order concerned, it
being understood that such indication can be very succinct.

What order? Has openchage filled a case with a prosecutor in order for this order to exist?

Next time when I ask you to quote the law, please do QUOTE the law, don't be a smartass tossing google links you haven't ever read. I've done this kind of stuff in the EU for enough time to know when somebody is bullshiting about being a lawyer or knowing what laws are broken in a case