Quote from: darkv0rt3x on July 07, 2022, 08:57:30 PM

Quote from: Snowshow on July 07, 2022, 06:38:12 PM

Quote from: tadamichi on July 07, 2022, 06:00:13 PM

Quote from: Snowshow on July 07, 2022, 05:12:35 PM

That has nothing to do with utilization,

It has.

Quote from: Snowshow on July 07, 2022, 05:12:35 PM

If bitcoin can be utilized, then a person that has 1,000,000 BTC, in comparation with a person that has 0.0001 BTC, must be able to get 10,000,000,000 more benefit without selling BTC to someone else.

You’re saying must and have to, even tho this isn’t a rule that’s written anywhere. Anyone should be able to benefit regardless of how much money they have, and they do by using a fair system. But for the sake of the argument, the person with more Bitcoin will also be able to make more transactions if they want to, so they “benefit” more. And in the real world where it’s always possible to use Bitcoin as money, this person with more Bitcoin can also acquire much more resources.

Quote from: Snowshow on July 07, 2022, 05:12:35 PM

But obviously this is impossible. Because BTC is a number. Mathematical abstraction with zero utilization capacity. It's mind boggling how much stupidity you're are capable to produce only to try to defend undefendable.

So math has no practical applications and utility? So how are we communicating right now?

Quote from: Snowshow on July 07, 2022, 05:12:35 PM

Regarding the rest. My bike is non productive.

You dont ask questions about a bike on a public forum, on why it can’t fly. Yet youre here questioning why a Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System is mainly used for this purpose, and that it’s a problem and makes it worthless.

Quote from: Snowshow on July 07, 2022, 05:12:35 PM

Stop defending this scam. You look foolish.

Projection.

There are no transactions. A transaction is the exchange of resources. There's no money. Money is a resource. There's no Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. Electronic cash or money is representation of an already existing money. So, you're just repeating language manipulation that Nakamoto used in Bitcoin Whitepaper.

More opinions of yourself. More shit chat. More rethoric words to say absolutely nothing! There are transactions. When you send Bitcoin to someone, because this someone gave/returned a service/good/ or anything else, you're exchanging Bitcoin for that good/service. That is a transaction. The good exchanged is the resource! P2P means between 2 perople without any intermediaries, which checks. So, once more you make non-sence statements, unfunded, no facts, zero...

It's not an opinion. It's a fact. A transaction is the exchange of resources. Resources provide utility and by comparing the utilities of the two resources people knoe how much one resource will be giving for another and vice versa. Attaching a number to jot online address has nothing to do with the transactions, but with joining Nakamoto's fraudulent investment scheme and being numerically labeled in the process.