Allow me to embed the image from another host:

So, you're saying the funds came from a hack 5 transactions and 8 years ago. Without verifying the chain evidence, even if this is correct, it makes no sense to blame the current owner of the funds. Just like you can't be blamed if you received dollar bills that were previously stolen from a bank.
Luckily, the funds now moved to the address of a large exchange, so it's at 7 transactions now and completely clean, right? Don't you see none of this makes any sense?