Re: People are waking up to the fact that viruses and germ theory are fake.
Eating the rotten meat has wrong thinking ahead of doing it
As does ignoring the vast amounts of data, from innumerable independent sources all around the world, proving that the Covid vaccines are safe and effective.
If you are going to form an opinion on something, when why would you disregard the evidence?
The answer of course is that your opinion against the vaccines was already formed before any data were available. Which then leads you to desperately cherry-pick (and divest of context) anything that you can to prop up your preconceived opinion. This is wrong thinking. Right thinking, when confronted with data that challenge your opinion, is to investigate, not to bury your head in the sand.
Vast amounts of data are the problem. Why? Because the data is or is based on ideas that have not been proven. Regarding viruses, the bottom-line of the data info is always wording that says things like "we think," "it looks like," "maybe," and a whole lot of wording that says that they don't really know... that they only assume.
Then there's the other side, the trick-the-electron-microscope side. They throw a whole bunch of junk together, including human cells, poisons and monkey kidney stuff, and feed it to starved, dying cell cultures. The result is some tiny particles they call viruses. You can see them in an electron microscope. But all they are is poisoned, dead pieces of nobody-really-knows-what.
I have been asking franky1 for ages for some real proof of virus isolation... where some researcher took some "gunk" out of a person, and actually "pulled" a virus out of the stuff. When researchers do this kind of isolation, they write the steps in their notebooks, along with explanations, so that other researchers can duplicate the process, to see if they can all get the same results. F-1 hasn't been able to show me a notebook with this being done. Dr. Kaufman hasn't been able to find it either, with his access to medical libraries that he has because he is a doctor.
The medical data you talk about has been built on a lie. And the more the lie is touted as truth, the more people like you believe it, and the less they go out and prove it to themselves.
Or do you have the actual notebook of the process of a virus being isolated like this, with written step-by-step procedures, so that somebody can use the same equipment that the researcher who wrote the notebook used, and isolate the same virus out of the same kind of "gunk" as the researcher did?
