Quote from: aylabadia05 on Today at 10:03:30 AM

Quote from: amishmanish on July 11, 2022, 03:58:32 PM

When banking system was created, the bills were attributed some value, something we today call as fiat currency. Its nothing but a piece of paper backed by reserve bank. Still it changed the way we do transactions( Previously it was barter). Then came the online banking, but it lacked the flexibility of true digital currency. That is where satoshi saw opportunity and gave us a system of online currencies, today we call as crypto, which can help us make blockchain based transaction. Which outweighs fiat or online banking.

You are right and I agree with you.
2017 I am familiar with this forum and continue to explore the "difference" between the process of using fiat money and digital currencies otherwise known as crypto. Satoshi's intelligence in giving birth to crypto is extraordinary, especially Bitcoin. He came not to fool the world, but Satoshi conveyed to the world that Bitcoin is the best solution when it comes to future finances. So it is appropriate that the sentence ~~Cryptocurrency~~Bitcoin is freedom, Banking is slavery that Lauda quoted from Arif Naseem.

You seem to recognize that there is a difference between bitcoin and crypto.. but you are still juxtaposing those terms and even suggesting that bitcoin is just a part of crypto.. which is a kind of shitcoiner (and a confused persons) way of talking about the whole matter including actually knowing what is bitcoin and not being afraid to focus on talking about bitcoin as a force in itself.

Don't get me wrong. Sometimes I also use the term crypto and/or talk about various cryptocurrencies (aka shitcoins), and even describe some other projects and dynamics in broader "crypto" space, such as NFTs, ICOs, Defi and perhaps some other projects that may or may not have some connection with bitcoin.

Yes.. it is a kind of pet peeve of mine, but there seems to be way too much lack of clarity in the way the terms crypto and cryptocurrency is being discussed, and it seems to me that if we are mostly talking about bitcoin, then there is likely no need to even mention crypto or cryptocurrencies, but sometimes if we are talking about various dynamics beyond bitcoin then there might be some kind of need to bring it up.. so accordingly, if we are talking about what satoshi did, to me, it seem way more appropriate and adequate to proclaim that satoshi was building bitcoin, not "crypto".. yeah.. satoshi did mention some other crypto currencies in his various forum interactions, but it seems quite in accurate to be suggesting that satoshi brought "crypto" to the world - even if satoshi himself recognized that the dynamic of just creating bitcoin was quite likely to spark a variety of imitation projects, forks and even snake oil salesmen and snake oil products.

So I suppose part of my own ongoing desires to combat the loose framings of bitcoin as it relates to various other aspects of the space has to do with how various shitcoins, scams and even shady folks are using that kind of vague language to confuse people in regards to what is bitcoin and what are bitcoin projects as compared to some of their projects that may or may not be as closely related to bitcoin as they are making them out to be.

Quote from: Snowshow on Today at 02:14:45 PM

@JayJuanGee Can you please, please stop trolling this topic. Read the OP to see what this topic is about.

I already addressed this point. I see little to no purpose for you to raise the point again, unless if you might wrongly conclude that if you keep raising the point, your incorrect assertions contained therein might fantastically in your dreamlandia become true.

By the way: Fuck off with giving me assignments, you dweeb.

Another point that might be worthy to raise is that your practice of ongoingly changing the title of this thread further buttresses why no one (neither this cat nor anyone else) has any obligation whatsoever to go back and read your ever-shifting bullshit (whether in the OP or any other posts that you made)...

Sure, if you had been trying to genuinely work with ideas around this particular topic and you had shown that you were truly trying to learn along the way and to make fair changes that were in line with some semblance of the original topic.. or even if you had been keeping the original title and then just adding new titles and showing each version of the title in the OP, then those could have been potentially fair and reasonable ways that you could have been fucking around with the thread title and the substance of the OP.

You have not even come close to showing yourself as any kind of genuine player who deserves any deference when it comes to matters related to this thread.. and to reiterate, I have already stated in my earlier responses to your earlier beseechenings in this direction.. which likely establishes that I have been way more on-topic and even providing something that was more lacking in gobble-dee-gook than uie-pooie.