Quote from: BlackHatCoiner on Today at 08:12:53 AM

Quote from: Snowshow on Today at 07:29:17 AM

It's like if you would give me $100 and in return I would give you a paper sticker saying "Thanks".

Analogies isn't your strong point.

A "Thanks" sticker can't be sent across communication channels nearly instantly, in a censorship-resistant fashion. I can't send it across the world for a cent. It isn't resistant to confiscation. It can't be possessed in a divided manner. It doesn't grant me the access to an independent and transparent network, wherein users can verify that it has changed hands, without knowing who's the new owner. Sticker users can't verify who mints them, how many they are, how hard it is to create new ones, which part of the supply they own, because there's no transparency. Owning stickers doesn't give you the option to store messages on an immutable ledger.

With bitcoin, you do gain these benefits. That's why we're all willing to trade monetary value for it. You can whine about it, make videos, call it ponzi, lie about non-existent resources, bring friends to this thread, but you won't get to enjoy these benefits otherwise. We do.

That's how bitcoins, that is, ponzi tokens, are sold to naive and gullible people. You introduce a system which efficiency transfer, stores and protects record about the amount ponzi tokens, and then you advertise that this is benefit or utility of ponzi tokens. So, it's not my analogy what is the problem. But your naivety and gullibility.