Quote from: examplens on Today at 06:45:16 PM

Quote from: NeuroticFish on Today at 01:51:28 PM

Quote from: LoyceV on July 17, 2022, 03:36:49 PM

When this site scams someone, which I think is quite likely to happen, will Gianluca95 take the fall for them and get tagged?

The campaign manager doesn't have to endorse the business he is advertising.
While indeed there are quite a number of red flags with that business, Gianluca's main job is to ensure the advertisers/users in the campaign will get paid correctly.
Now, if the company indeed scams, if the campaign still continues, then there's a problem for Gianluca and the people wearing the signature.

in the past we have had signature campaigns launched by proven fraudsters. they regularly paid all campaign participants, no one is tagged for that. we are now condemning before the scam happened.
somewhere in the essence, I myself advocate that it is better to prevent than to be sorry. but that's just my feeling, also as LoyceV thinks the scam is expected from Shaker finance.
Again, I don't see Ginaluca's mistake even if he continued the campaign, given that he kept the funds for the campaign.

btw. what will we do next with the other campaigns? most of those involved in these discussions are from the Bitcoin paid campaign but in the bounty section we have many campaigns, and we all know that the majority of them are scams. we follow them to a much lesser extent, so we are not committed
some are led by the best and most recognized managers, but after a few weeks of the campaign, no one is interested in the fate of the business behind them.

You should really have been quoting also the next line from my post. Without it.. it kinda sounds like you're trying to argue with me, .. telling exactly what I concluded with: unless anything proven, there's still the benefit of the doubt.

And I also said that he should be careful with the funds.

So I'd say we're on the same page.