Quote from: Little Mouse on July 18, 2022, 03:20:04 PM

Come on, mate. If someone doesn't have any problem attaching their brand to a neg tagged user, that's their choice.

Nice, you're right. But let's take a look at one of the suggestions on signature guidelines, it would be great for every manager to consider. So we don't have to worry too much about that because the campaign manager also has a perspective on why participants are accepted or not on a case by case basis. But if the tag was clearly caused by cheats in some of the previous campaigns, then accepting it in the campaign is a bad idea.

Quote from: hilariousandco on November 17, 2016, 12:46:01 PM

• Consider not accepting users with negative feedback. It never looks good when users have negative feedback and 99% of the time the feedback is there for a good reason, but if you want to take this on a case by case basis then that's down to you.

Quote from: Little Mouse on July 18, 2022, 03:20:04 PM

Did you tag them because you want them to be kicked out from the campaign?

Nope, it's a bad idea and I've never thought of anything like that.

Quote from: Little Mouse on July 18, 2022, 03:20:04 PM

I'm pretty much sure your motive was to expose them as alt only. You feedback is still valid to expose them as alt. You don't need to be worried anymore I think.

You're right, the motive is to find more cheater and tell managers that they shouldn't work with cheater. My question is only because there are rules stating prohibition, otherwise what's the point of rules?

Quote from: JeromeTash on July 18, 2022, 08:07:35 PM

I have seen a couple of managers (not 1xbit) accept certain users with negative rep.

Remember, it is at their discretion on a case by case basis. But back to the best advice, don't give cheater a chance to promote your campaign as they might as well scam you. So I'm done here.