One ended up being too hostile and decided not to co-operate me. I was asked to KYC him (my hands are still tied and considering the situation it will be for good) because he was threatening to kill the CEO and confirmed hiring professional killer from darkweb. He denied even after I had evidence of the conversation he was posting in his private social channels to his audience.
why do you still insist on KYC in order to repay deposits? what is it for?
as far as I've seen Bitlucy is dead, and the website is offline. so there is no one behind it, to whom KYC is actually shown?
I understood that KYC verification was requested for the return of the deposit, correct me if I'm wrong.
You have raised a valid concern but as usual Royse777 has not answered questions she finds difficult to explain. Bitlucy does not exist. Under which rules and under which jurisdiction is Royse777 asking for KYC?
It seems KYC or not, Royse777 stated she will not send the victim money that was scammed by Bitlucy even after Royse777 promised to return to all victims.