After all, if it was the CEO who held 100% of the company but he surrendered 10% of his holdings, what was Bitlucy going to gain from it?
Don't we know the answer to this already? Bitlucy has gained a reputable face in the community, something that made people trust it easily, a face that was to blame when everything has fallen apart.
however, I think that the whole communication, in this case, and everything that happens afterwards, could have been set up better. To avoid wrong interpretations and subsequent explanations of the same.
Indeed. Somehow the communication in this issue was.. sub-standard... (for example, I don't understand why the closure for the famous google form were not announced
[or I just missed that??], it could have been helped).
But with so many people pushing Royse - some for good reason, some others simply for their own benefit - rushed and heated answers are not that much of a surprise.
I try to stay somewhat away from this drama, but I still want to say something to JollyGood: you've done very good job many times in nailing scammers, but I have a feeling you're exaggerating in this matter. Of course, I may be wrong, still...please think on this.