Quote from: FatFork on Today at 12:02:25 PM

Quote from: igehhh on July 26, 2022, 08:07:47 PM

Absolutely correct! It's crazy how some DT just give out neg tag at any slice chance, and if Bustadice has no problem with other start-up casinos using some of their content, I don't see why some random internet users who aren't related to Bustadice would take matters into their own hands. The site has yet to defraud anyone, and no withdrawal issues have been reported.

I disagree. Don't you think it's fair to warn the community if you, for example, find a project with a plagiarized whitepaper or fake team members, or a casino with a plagiarized content and an unlicensed script?

Quote from: igehhh on July 26, 2022, 08:07:47 PM

The red is excessive; he admitted his mistakes and made amends; I hope the DT reconsiders and gives him another chance. Everyone is deserving of it. Cheers!

It's a matter of opinion. You are free to exclude the mentioned DT members from your trust list if you don't agree with their opinion.

Quote from: igehhh on July 26, 2022, 08:07:47 PM

@devans what do you think? ( Bustadice admin)

I suggest you read the OP's post again, and also the trust feedback left on his profile.

Quote from: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=3486549

devans

2022-06-27

Reference

In addition to obviously plagiarizing large parts of bustadice.com, 8bethub is also using bustadice's code without its permission.

I know that plagiarism, even little, or even if chanced or removed, it is in the end still plagiarism. But what I am trying to get across is that the only parts that were in this discussione were some text elements on the homepage, that were simply close in meaning, not exactly the same at all. I meant something totally different too, which I did explain, however, I did remove that in order to try show that I will improve the platform. And about the code, nothing was plagiarised from bustadice's code at all, the gitbhub repos should have never been used either, and I did makje sure to get this point across to my team by removing the person who thought it would have been a good idea. That is why I am taking this here, as althought his post was valid, there was some sort of misunderstanding too, and I cleared that, improved on that too I hope.