Everything confuses me a little now if you complain about something that you yourself do.
Sorry if you are confused and thinking I did the same as he did. It must be my failure. But any way let me try again.
His feedback has no reference (he does not have one in fact) to response my negative feedback to him.
He says I was posting lie
He says my accusations are baseless
He thinks its a revenge
The repeating part is not clear to me.
More reasons,
I did not leave red or neutral to bitlucy scam.
From above which one warns a red tag or even a negative inspired neutral feedback?
My feedback has a clear reference:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5408864.msg60704946#msg60704946First of all he did not pay user starmyc but silent him with his negative feedback. He did not reply to my PM and even still have not replied to me for a clear explanation which leads me to believe that he does not have one but scammed.
More supporting cause
I have my reasons explained in the reference. In short
[....]
2. His arguments are inappropriate and his use of red tags based on the inappropriate arguments. He did it twice (from the limited investigation I conducted myself) once for nemgun and recently for Royse777
More and more
[......]
It was on telegram where CEO used the user @BitlucyCEO
Has notting to do with Royse777[......]
Well it does not matter which employee or part owner of Bitlucy contacted you to work for them. Based on the facts as they are known thus far, Bitlucy was owned by two people: Royse777 and the Bitlucy CEO - therefore some would say it does have something to do with Royse777.
[......]
Are you saying for example, in a group of company if the chairman runaway with the fund resulting the entire company including their shareholders in loss, you are going to tag the chairman and all the shareholders? This is pathetic. You were the same pathetic against the user nemgun too.[......]
.
I have pointed out 4 inspirations for leaving a negative feedback in the starting topic.
(1) clearly out of retaliatory, (2) clearly to hostage others to silent against him, (3) clearly based on inappropriate arguments, (4) clearly using it to scam others
(1). Which ones apply to his feedback left for me, starmyc, nemgun and Royse777?
(2). Which ones apply to my feedback?