Quote from: examplens on August 09, 2022, 11:33:32 AM

although you both changed your feedback, I'm still convinced that both of you were forced and that this is some kind of discussion between you. which again, is not the correct use of the trust rating system here.

Obviously you missed the main conversation. Does it look like I was forced or I considered breaking it because it was more accurate?

Quote

everything we have in the case starmyc vs Jollygood is an exchange of feedback between the two of them and a message to you via PM. unfortunately, this is not enough for anything, and without presenting clear evidence by any of them.

Did JollyGood provide any clear evidence or a convincing response about it yet? (1) I offered him to have a one to one conversation in PM. (2) Then he was given chance to support his reasoning on this topic. There are nothing yet. When someone does not have anything to say in their defense silence is the best response which is what JollyGood is using.

But starmyc explained the situation and as an ex Software Engineer I am well aware that how a freelance job conducts. Read and it will help. Starmyc recommends,

Quote from: starmyc on July 17, 2022, 01:34:57 PM

I recommend not working with him, or asking to be paid using a third party and really well defined & trackable requirements to not get cheated on.

Quote from: starmyc on August 08, 2022, 10:36:00 AM

Also, the amount was really small so (I don't remember the precise amout, but it was like < 200$ in btc)... as this story is old, and I'm out of business, I've no longer any interest about recovering this small amount of money.

I'm sad because I spent quite some time to work on this stuff at the time and all I got is this bad reputation stuff.
But well, that's life and there are more important things to deal with.

JollyGood is lucky that still there are no type three flag against him because starmyc lost his interest.

Point his, how many starmyc you need to see before you realize JollyGood is using his feedback to hostage others and benefit his own satisfactions?

Quote

it is evident that your negative feedback was given to him (Jollygood), provoked by your attitude and feelings toward him. I believe you know, such cases are more like a neutral tag, not negative or even positive.

You are asking the wrong person. You need to ask JollyGood when to leave a neutral or when not to leave a neutral also when to leave a negative.

Quote

no matter how harsh and merciless he seemed when giving negative tags, however, he is ready to admit his mistake.

How many corrections of mistakes do you think is enough to cool of JollyGood drama in reputation thread?
You will find many only in this single topic : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5260202.0
There were many more cases I read in the last few days against him.
Retaliatory feedback then feel pressure from the community, change it to neutral.
Retaliatory tilde
Even tilde when he does not like a post that does not support his arguments.
That's what he is continuing from the past few years.

I consider you as a sensible forum user but I am sorry to say that you are embarrassing yourself not to see the changed JollyGood which is resulting you are promoting an overzealous, mentally unfit mad man.

Let's continue JollyGood related conversations here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5407834.msg60722729#new

I was expecting a response of the questions I asked you in my last post.