Quote from: Poker Player on Today at 02:28:51 PM

For DT2, net of 1, but with a minimum of 2 DT1 inclusions seems like it would be an improvement to start with. DT1 is more complicated, I guess it is difficult and no one has a 100% clear idea.

If only 1 DT1 inclusion is needed for DT1 to get to DT2, it is not bad at all, I am okay with that, some members will be okay with that too, but if the community support a minimum of 2 DT1 inclusions, it is not also bad too, but just that it will be harder for people that are in DT1 to get to DT2 and DT2 may become more centralized. What I think is that DT system can not be totally accurate, it will be faulty to an extent, but the good side of the one we are now is not bad at all.

Theymos can try and make a poll about this, but I do not think it is necessary. I do not want more power to be amount some people that can make DT2 more centralized. Some people are want this just because they may be unable to manipulate the DT2, I do not know but that is what I am thinking, which makes me like this current DT system. I am not upoorting that.

If we see things, this present DT system is not bad at all.