When a bunch of simps are chumped by huxters such as NASA and their spreading of fake science, then the simps have _no_ leg to stand on when NASA comes clean on 'the science'. That is good reason to call attention to it.
If someone spends pretty much their entire time in P&S attacking every example of scientific evidence that is presented, then it seems reasonable to conclude that their arguments are faith-based rather than fact-based. If they then cite as a source of authority an institution that they've previously and routinely disparaged, then that just lends weight to the conclusion that they're simply seeking out
anything that
anybody says that supports (or, more often, and more superficially, merely
appears to support) whatever half-baked notion they have already decided, sans evidence, is the indisputable truth.
As for 'big oil', they are the biggest sponsors of the 'green' scammers who are making bank off the whole charade. Last I looked oil was going for something like $90/barrel and it technically easier and cheaper to extract/transfer than it ever was due to a variety of developments. Do get it? Probably not.
No, I don't get it, because this is complete nonsense. You do realise that the oil companies make vast profits, and indeed have announced record-breaking profits during the last few weeks? But you contend that they are actually intent on destroying their own gargantuan money-making machine in order to further a green agenda? Seems somewhat unlikely.
