Quote from: Yogee on Today at 10:13:18 PM

Let's not jump the gun here. That "proposal" or I would rather call it as a rumor was already denied by Kyrie in a simple tweet. No words but a gif tipping of a hat which basically refers to "cap" meaning the report was a lie.
https://bleacherreport.com/articles/10045107-kyrie-irving-responds-to-rumors-he-wanted-games-limit-no-back-to-backs-in-contract

Maybe the part where he hasn't played 60 games yet for the franchise was discussed during the negotiation for his contract but it was taken out of context.

Thanks for clarifying that. It is easy for us to jump the gun since this is Kyrie we are talking about. It is actually normal for him to ask this ridiculous request. I also failed to verify the rumor and just concluded it is true.

Quote from: dwyane36 on Today at 05:18:03 PM

Quote from: Russlenat on Today at 11:27:12 AM

He is just trying to pressure the Warriors to give him a max contract as he is part of the big 3, it's just unfortunate that his performance is not so impressive in the playoffs although they won the championship. However, in the end, it still depends on the decision of the Warriors if they will give him a max contract or not, and it's also up to Green if he will look for another team to give them what he is asking for.

If you had said Draymond Green was part of the big trio a few seasons ago, I would have certainly agreed with your statement. However, based on last season's results, Green's performance hasn't been impressive, and he's definitely not part of the big trio anymore. Maybe some will disagree with me, but it seems to me that Curry, Thompson, and Wiggins can be named as the Warriors' big trio at the moment.

Green is still part of the big three of the warriors. It is just that his contributions cannot be recorded in the stat sheets. It is the intangibles that he keeps on contributing, that is also giving the steph and klay the space to do what they do. Otherwise, Steph would have not back his request for max.