Quote from: Jawadu on August 16, 2022, 07:17:44 PM

Bro, am not blaming but what am saying is that these tools are not to be trusted 100%. I'm a BM and I have used them mostly in checking articles, one tool will give you different results compared to the other (why now?).

I don't use plagiarism detection tools, I don't know where you got that idea from. This is the text compare tool you see in the screenshots, and as you can see, it works perfectly. Learn something about it if you want.

Quote from: Jawadu on August 16, 2022, 07:17:44 PM

You need to have strong proof that this project is fake, commenting here just saying stop scamming without strong proof is nothing! That's the truth.

A project that steals content from other projects, even something so simple like content on a website, or even the whole whitepaper, which should be the most important document for any new project, is a fake project. You can find all the evidence in the OP.

Quote from: Jawadu on August 16, 2022, 07:17:44 PM

If the OP will come with proof of the real project that he claimed to be copied by the one we promote, then I will agree with him! But I will never agree with him since he used a plagiarism tool to check the whitepaper and says the project is scam.

Again, I didn't use any plagiarism detection tools, and I don't care if you agree with me or not. That's up to the community to decide. As for the "real project", you can find all the information in the OP. I don't understand what more you want me to prove.

Quote from: Jawadu on August 16, 2022, 07:17:44 PM

If scam was to be checked like that, then a lot of projects would be tagged as scam!

That may actually be true.

Quote from: KingsDen on August 16, 2022, 10:23:21 PM

Quote from: FatFork on August 16, 2022, 02:04:27 PM

What happened: QI Blockchain is yet another fake project with completely plagiarized whitepaper and website content from multiple sources.

You might be correct that the whitepaper of the project is plagiarised, but you might be wrong calling the manager of the project a scammer or the project a scam. You provided evidences of plagiarism instead of that of scam. To the best of my knowledge, plagiarism is not equal to scam. You can report the account for plagiarism(which I'm not sure whitepaper plagiarism is among the forum rules). If the evidences are compelling, the account could get banned.
Meanwhile, you lack tangible evidence that the project is a scam, this is because majority of the projects these days doesn't engage professionally whitepaper writers, they go about paraphrasing multiple whitepapers to come out with their own version of garbage.
So, you could reconsider, because I know how frustrating it is for a genuine project struggling to see the light being faced with scam accusations without proves.

First of all, I'm surprised with your stance. As a senior member of this community, I think you should know better by now. You say, I might be correct about plagiarism? Please review the evidence first and let me know if I'm wrong about that. I welcome the opportunity to listen to and consider new information and opposing viewpoints, and admit when I am wrong.

Second, we seem to disagree on semantics, so let's get some facts straight. Plagiarizing other people's work without permission or attribution is a deceptive and fraudulent act that is not only detrimental to the community, but it is also illegal, and according to the English dictionary:

Quote from: merriam-webster.com

scam noun
\ ˈskam \
: a fraudulent or deceptive act or operation

Quote from: scam definition - google search

scam noun
\ ˈskam \
: a dishonest scheme; a fraud.

So, can you explain to me, in which sense you can call a fraudulent project that steals ideas and content from someone else's work a "genuine" one?

It's not a genuine project. It just copies another project, and tries to fool people into thinking it's something new and innovative when in fact it is neither. Therefore, it's just a scam. And I find it odd that you think this practice is acceptable. It's not. Plagiarism is stealing, and theft is wrong.