The reason we did not post frequently here is we think the claim should be filed to SandBOX but not owl.games. We have been posting in OwlGames ANN thread regarding the case but we think it might be essential now to sync it here.

1. Relationship with SandBox ANN

Originally posted here:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5378280.msg60758150#msg60758150

Quote

We have seen several discussion on owl.games' relationship with sandboxcasino. As we posted early, sandboxcasino is fully operated on its own, with its own bankroll. We (owl.games) only provided the software.

Owl.games is the signature casino from OwlDAO, and OwlDAO is currently the biggest Web 3.0 iGaming Solution Provider, we actually provide service to more than 20 casinos partners.

In the very beginning, licensing was included in our casino service package and we provided license service to sandbox casino. It's common in the industry to offer license service, big iGaming Solution Providers such as softgaming provide it as well.

As we develop, we ceased to provide licensing service. SandboxCasino has been the ONLY 1 casino that operates on its own and shared our license.

Since Sammy1's intentionally related owl.games with sandboxcasino, we do not want to get us into similar issues in the future.

We have notified Sandbox Team that we will terminate the license service and they agreed.

Regarding the license removal:

Yes, we do not want to get into this mess. We have been pushing SandBOX for Sammy actually all along and they had acted on our request but we deem their previous action incompetence to fix the issue.

And since SandBOX is the only early client that has subleased our license, we confirmed with them that they are OK to operate without a license. Hence as the software provider we removed the license link and references to Cyber Galaxy B.V. in the doc.

Regarding the statement 'All payment with PaySafe are made via Cyber Galaxy B.V'.

Paysafe is a online payment company just like PayPal. This statement just means that if someone deposits via PaySafe it will be sent to Cyber Galaxy B.V. It's only relevant with fiat currency because in real world if you want to integrate a fiat currency payment processor you have to provide license to them.

OwlGames only provide 100% crypto currency iGaming solutions so we deem this clause irrelevant so it has been there forever. This does not mean that all your crypto payment will go to Cyber Galaxy B.V. but only means if we ever provide PaySafe (https://www.paysafe.com/), the account recipient will be Cyber Galaxy B.V. because it's legally required to be that.

2. Sammy Case Progress

We have stepped in to push SandBOX for Sammy's case. We did not want to interfere with our sublessee's business but as Sammy kept intentionally posting false claims on us we felt that we must at least act as a coordinator to fix the case.

We have unblocked Sammy's account On Aug 16th, 2022 and sent him a KYC request, log shows that he did logged in and took a peek into the KYC system and did not submit anything. Sammy should fill the KYC within 2 weeks so we can help push SandBOX for his case.

Conversation can be found here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5378280.msg60763636#msg60763636

3. Payment sent to Sammy

We have finally confirmed with SandBOX that they admitted they sent Sammy 5300 USDt and another 5300 USDt together. SandBox has not paid Sammy since Jun 14th, 2022.

4. OwlGames Standing on SandBox Partnership

OwlGames has spent more than $500k on our buy-back and staking rewards of the $OWL token to help build our eco system. We do not want our reputation to be hurt like that. We have already informed SandBOX, in addition to the license removal we want to cancel the partnership. We are in discussion of a proper exit route for SandBOX.

For buyback history of $OWL token please refer to https://owldao.io/stats

We do urge that Sammy stop spamming on false claims regarding owl.games while we have already stepped out for him. The spamming and attacking also forms violation towards bicointalk rules. We have demanded mutual respect but it seems to be ignored once and again. We would see Sammy in court if Sammy continues with his spamming and attacking on owl.games brand. (per conversation here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5378280.msg60761500#msg60761500)

If Sammy does not need any coordination of owl.games, he should not spam on owl.games anymore. Instead, he should directly file a complaint with the licensor regarding SandBox. Tho the claim should NOT be filed against owl.games, in this circumstance, we welcome him to file a complaint on us too.

Also this will be our last reply here in this thread. We think we have done our best to answer every question raised.