--snip--
Off-topic? Do we actually need to establish the fact that WasabiWallet's pool = also its users? I'm sorry, I thought you already understood that, and that we're on the same page in that matter.
I do not consider owner/operator of Wasabi CoinJoin coordinator as user. To be specific, i'm talking about Wasabi Wallet user who use CoinJoin feature.
But anyway, whether right or wrong, whether you agree or disagree, the point is nopara37 accepted the trade off, and the users also have a choice if they want to accept the trade off. Because anyone can use another mixer that doesn't blacklist outputs, or another team can run another coordinator that doesn't blacklist outputs.
I get the point, although i have to remind that,
1. Some user probably don't know about blacklist.
2. Most user doesn't even aware you can switch to different coordinator.
I believe that's a debate for another topic.
Plus to make myself and where I stand clear, I don't believe you are wrong in disagreeing in WasabiWallet's acceptance of taking the trade off, and blacklisting "tainted" outputs, or outputs used for "illegal transactions". I understand your debate in the matter because "taint" truly doesn't exist in the blockchain. BUT, with government sanctions on computer programs, services and public wallets, I'm merely making a point that it's up to the user/service if he/she/they want to accept those trade offs, or not.