Quote from: BlackHatCoiner on August 19, 2022, 01:08:23 PM

Quote from: Wind_FURY on August 19, 2022, 09:28:21 AM

truly untainted outputs

What the fuck. Truly untainted, based on who? By default, every output is "truly untainted", because bitcoins are fungible. That's what we're saying pages now.

Based on "them", and "their rules". If you were truly reading my posts, you would truly get the context of my posts.

Quote

Quote from: Wind_FURY on August 19, 2022, 09:28:21 AM

Protection from government sanctions.

No. If 10 out of the 300 inputs that are used in CoinJoin are "tainted" according to the chain analysis company, they can't file a lawsuit to every user who's part of the CoinJoin, that's just nonsense. Zero protection there. That's probably why they're implementing blacklisting in the first place.

You would be technically correct, but "they" didn't care about that when "they" sanctioned Tornado Cash. And that was the point. What would happen to all of those outputs that went through Tornado Cash?

WasabiWallet took the decision to block outputs used in "illegal transactions" according to "them", as a way to avoid "them" from sanctioning Wasabi. It's the user's choice if he/she wants to take the trade off of using Wasabi, or not.

Quote

Quote from: Wind_FURY on August 19, 2022, 09:28:21 AM

As illustrated by Tornado's sanction, will exchanges and other services really accept all those outputs that can be connected to Tornado? I believe they will not take that risk.

You're going off-topic again. Show me what protection do the users gain. The ability to send money to anti-privacy and pro-censorship services that treat bitcoin as non-fungible and enforce claptrap rules is irrelevant.

Did you get my point/debate, or are you trying not to? I don't know why many people are so provoked by the trade off taken by WasabiWallet, and its users.