Quote from: franky1 on Today at 05:23:54 AM

the point of blockchains and bitcoins invention 13 years ago was the solution to the byzantine generals problem where different people had different idea's of what direction to go forward(the problem)

a:(not the solution/purpose of blockchains)
it was not to have a commander/chief deciding, where all his captains follow and all the troops follow the captains
(one source of protocol, multiple source of litewallet, thousands of users)

b: (the solution/brilliance of blockchain purpose)
it was suppose to be multiple brands in operation, cooperating on same level playing field where any of them can pitch an idea/mission plan. and all brands at same level would announce the mission plan to their loyal troops and the idea/plan that rallied enough troops combined from all loyal brand bases towards that same cause, meant that the majority accepted mission moves forward in that direction.

instead it became a contentious battlefield where anyone not following the core mission was to be cast aside and treated as a outsider, spy, opponent, saboteur. where they need to become the enemy in single brans loyal troops eyes. and then fought off the fields and if they survive to have them in a completely separate playing field(altcoin)
(research REKT campaigns circa 2014-17, research mandatory deployment circa 2017)

this is where thousands of devs over the years ended up leaving bitcoin to do their own projects. as they were pushed out of the bitcoin community.

Translation: franky1 thinks everyone has to listen to and seriously consider stupid and dangerous ideas that have the potential to damage Bitcoin. People promoting stupid and dangerous ideas should be encouraged to stick around, even their their ideas could never be implemented because they aren't remotely compatible with the direction the project is taking.

I'm sorry, but that's just not practical. Development becomes a hassle if everyone involved is trying to pull in different directions. And you are in no position to tell anyone who they can or can't refuse to work with. Not your call. Go be a dictator somewhere else.

Also there's absolutely nothing preventing another dev team forming. You could do it yourself. In fact, I've suggested before that you need to prove your ideas work by building them, rather than just constantly whining about how no one does it the way you want it done. Do it. Form a dev team. Create some code. Make whatever ridiculous, broken, mind-numbingly stupid shit you want. No one can stop you.

But you won't. All noise, no action (or sense). That's the franky1 way.