Quote from: DooMAD on Today at 10:51:49 AM

You've made it abundantly clear that your ideal version of Bitcoin (which only exists in your imagination right now) wouldn't be compatible with the current consensus rules. You ask for shit that would cause a fork and then you piss, whine and cry when people suggest you go ahead and create that fork. What the hell do you want, you raving psycho?

doomad you only see me mention how consensus works. becasuse its YOU that keep getting it wrong so whehn i repeatedly correct YOU, its YOU that see me doing it..

maybe take a wild chance on yourself. rol the dice and play a different game

consensus does not cause a fork. GET THAT THROUGH YOUR HEAD!!!!
becasue true consensus the way that bitconi invented it when he released bitocin and blockchains i
is that upgrades DO NOT EVEN ACTIVATE until there is majority acceptance. meaning there would be no contentious fork

however recent events when core done update they CAUSED contention by doing mandated updates before majority. just to fork people off to the fake majority for secondary update.

YOU KNOWE THIS AND EVERY COUPLE YEARS YOU REALISE IT AND ACCEPT IT. then you go through a stupid game of forgetting it and then you get upset when you get corrected AGAIN

now i know you will play games about show proof.
where i will show you the bips of the mandadted code. which you will then say you never used bitcoin at that time to realise it. then you will cower down and be quite about the topic for a while..

so skip the usual drama games of ignorance and get to the point where you actually bother to read code and data and history and not just use your forgetfulness as a defence of why you have no understanding yet again

so go read something for once instead of telling people to leave the network and shut up about core centralisation..
REALISE even the lead maintainer is calling out on the centralisation and al the toxic crap of the last 7 years. so accept it happened and move on