Quote from: Crypt0S0ul on Today at 05:31:58 PM

Quote from: Little Mouse on Today at 05:12:43 PM

If I'm correct, many reputed members have traded accounts here back in the day. -snip- So, I don't think you should dig such accounts.

Oh! I didn't know that. When you mention reputed membersrs. It's interesting. I don't think reputed members will scam someone or post shit.

maybe the title "reputed members" sounds a little arrogant.
in your case, where you are talking about accounts that have changed owners, that is not the right word. maybe it would have been previously respectable accounts that trusted members owned.
if such an account has changed owners, I believe it is important for possible future trade with that member.
again, let's not make everything revolve around signature and bounty campaigns. some campaigns will allow participation with multiple accounts, so it doesn't necessarily have to be the main problem.

Quote

The thread you referred to as an example is good. But, The problem is, I don't think DT members will check my thread often and check if I posted new findings or not. actmyname is DT himself and he left a neutral tag which Is visible as trusted feedback. But, I have to wait for a DT member to check and evaluate.

OP, you already get a suggestion, you need to open a new thread where you will expose all cases. present all the evidence, and DT members will support you for sure. If over time you prove to be reliable in busting traded accounts, you will earn your place in the DT list, so your feedback will be more important.