Quote from: Betwrong on Today at 09:36:10 AM

Quote from: Dunamisx on August 23, 2022, 09:30:26 AM

As to how i understand this, the games with the biggest win has the biggest risk that follows as well, taking the risk is what makes it worth a deserving winning as all hope could have been dash way in playing games with high risk, that's why when you place a bet you discover the higher the numbers of games selected the more the risk and the total winnings, while the more you increases your stake as well the more you're vulnerable to loosing the entire stake for naught and the more are your winning amounts increasing, but for having the biggest win with the Lowest risk only take a luck and this comes once in a blue moon.

All the winners in the OP's example were spending from 30 cents to $50, not big money for anyone living in the West. So, it wasn't a "biggest risk", if you ask me.

This formula, "the more money you can potentially win, the higher the amount you have to put at risk", is true when you are betting on Red/Black in Roulette, but in slots and lottery, it doesn't work like that.

They spent small money, but we know just about money they used for winning. I think that they spent more money without winning. But you`re right about the risk, if we are talking about the bet. If we can know the chance of such a win for a such sum - the percent will be really scanty.