There are no guarantees, yes, but it doesn't change the whole point that there are more risks that WasabiWallet is merely trying to avoid by accepting the trade off by having their coordinator block outputs used in "illegal transactions".
The risks that you claim Wasabi are trying to avoid only exist because companies like Wasabi are enforcing them in the first place. Wasabi is part of the problem here, not part of the solution.
"Enforce"? How has WasabiWallet enforced anything? Or are we each using a different definition of enforce? Because if Wasabi/nopara73 didn't accept the trade-off to block outputs from "illegal transactions", the government would still enforce "their regulations".
There's some probability that it might be connected to your real identity, right? I believe for ordinary users, just avoid taking actions that would put him/her at risk.
And how do we know what actions "put someone at risk" considering Wasabi have not revealed which blockchain analysis company they are paying to spy on you or what their criteria are? It sounds very much like you are saying "Well, just make sure you have nothing to hide, and then you'll have nothing to worry about."
That's a good point, and also valid, but it doesn't mean my point is invalid. If tainted outputs are connected to your wallets, and your wallets connected to your real identity, then I suggest to improve your OPSEC.