Quote from: suzanne5223 on August 17, 2022, 02:22:06 PM

Quote from: LUCKMCFLY on August 16, 2022, 03:38:15 PM

Quote from: suzanne5223 on August 04, 2022, 01:43:36 AM

Quote from: LUCKMCFLY on August 03, 2022, 05:50:15 PM

I think that when there is a person who has a criminal record, they should not pay so much attention to it, because it does not have much to do with online casinos, I think that all online casinos are interested in them playing on their platforms, putting in money and being able to do good management within them, I think that the other thing is the personal life of each one, and I do not think that a casino cares much about that. I know that the origin of funds is important but when it comes to FIAT money and those that most influence that's what banks are for, in crypto they skip all these things, giving the origin of funds in crypto, BTC, ETH or another I think would not make sense.
That is why some of the users always look for those casinos that provide privacy security and anonymity.

I have once done some research about the major reason why KYC was introduced in the casino and the answer is to protect the company from getting in trouble with the law since some people use them as a way to tint their stolen or illicit crypto so I believe casinos are not after users criminal but they are after keeping their record clean with the law.

If it is that way, it seems to me that it is something that is very good, in fact many people can use KYC as a way of not hiding what it is, however now it is that there are these types of demands in casinos, they seek to be as transparent as possible and despite the fact that it is something that people do not like, because most people do not like to give their data, it could be said that if the casino meets that requirement and that it has some seniority and if not it has negative reviews by the DT users of the forum it is something that is worth trusting, at least I see it that way, the KYC will always be an additional problem in crypto, because precisely the BTC was created so that people would not give their data or things like that, but in the case of casinos, the regulations and requirements are something else.

I agree with what you said. Bitcoin was created to be pseudonymous but I believe we already understand that change is always constant especially when it's an innovative setting if we don't want to lie to ourselves and I also believe we ought to foresee this happening in the cryptocurrency space if the ecosystem is getting more traffic or the institution is involved.

If that is a reality, of course, I know that there are many people who always seek to take care of their data and be the most anonymous so that no one knows anything about them, in fact on many occasions I have been in some threads where they talk about how would be the impact if Monero enters a casino? what would that acceptance be like and what would become of the other casinos seeing that they have an almost entirely anonymous currency, it is well known that Bitcoin is more universal and in all people what is heard most for the first time is Bitcoin, and then What is read or something is that altcoins and their functions are known, then this would be a great different option.

Quote from: Ebede on September 05, 2022, 10:54:11 PM

Quote from: crzy on September 05, 2022, 09:39:10 PM

Level 2 means providing other documents like Valid ID right? I think many will start to panic again once they asked for this KYC though of course this can still happen since Roobet requirement is quiet unpredictable and they made no announcements before making any changes. If that will be required, I also doubt that I can provide such documents, this can be a big problem to some gamblers too.

I don't know why people do fear KYC verification because i on my own i believe that KYC verification need to be necessary because sometimes it's come to player advantages, but people who in engaged in gambling do bot understand why gambling is differ from each other because they are making used of KYC verification.

Well the truth is that this is something that many people avoid, first of all KYC, and when talking about various levels of KYC it is much more panic, this is something that has been going on for a long time, but because the current requirements are very strong, the casino is almost not to blame, it must comply with the laws that carry out this procedure implies, I know that the casino risks losing many customers, but that is preferable to having to wait and have the casino closed totlam,nte that is something much worse, I know that we as players hate KYC, but somehow things are done better by following these rules.