Quote from: dkbit98 on Today at 07:13:21 PM

Quote from: n0nce on Today at 12:56:46 AM

Could be coincidence, though! Or testnet blacklisting! Or IP blacklisting after the mainnet CoinJoin attempt. While likely, the failed testnet attempt is not absolute proof that the failed mainnet attempt was not blacklisting.

Sorry sir, your theory failed because I don't use same IP address all the time, especially when wasabi wallet have Tor option integrated. Grin

I did mention it could also have been coincidence.

Quote from: dkbit98 on Today at 07:13:21 PM

Quote from: o_e_l_e_o on Today at 07:52:13 AM

Bisq, Electrum, Bitcoin Core, Linux, Tor. All of these things are open source and can be independently reviewed and verified.

You forgot to add Wasabi wallet in this list, it is also open source and independently reviewed and verified, and same thing I said for Wasabi applies to other wallets you mentioned.

He did not; only the Wasabi client is open-source, not the backend.
There is no closed / non-verifiable backend to be worried about in Bisq, Electrum, Bitcoin, Linux and Tor, though.

I think it's ridiculous that I have to even explain it, but:

Bisq, Bitcoin, Tor: P2P - everyone runs the same, open, software - no non-verifiable backend server exists.
Electrum: Attackable if you use default server; therefore requires to run your own.
Linux: Just an OS - no networking required to be able to use it.

Wasabi is attackable just like Electrum is, when using the default server. There is no way of knowing whether an Electrum server is logging extra data, tying data together by IPs and doing other such types of shenanigans. This makes running your own Bitcoin node + Electrum server so important.