Quote from: cryptohunter on April 06, 2014, 01:15:27 PM

Quote from: Amph on April 06, 2014, 01:07:54 PM

Quote from: cryptohunter on April 06, 2014, 12:42:51 PM

Quote from: IloveAnonCoin on April 06, 2014, 12:37:52 PM

Quote from: cryptohunter on April 06, 2014, 12:34:38 PM

Quote from: Amph on April 06, 2014, 12:30:23 PM

Quote from: cryptohunter on April 06, 2014, 12:21:33 PM

Quote from: Amph on April 06, 2014, 09:52:27 AM

Quote from: PhattyBanks on April 06, 2014, 09:29:56 AM

Quote from: Amph on April 06, 2014, 07:51:23 AM

bitcoin was instamined too stop the butthurt about instamine

bad launch time plus ninja launch is far worse than any instamined coin with ANN

it did have a 5am GMT launch

yeah i know, and darkcoin was bad for that not for the instamine

talking about instamine, if there is an ANN instamine can't hurt, because everyone will be there regardless, therefore with instamine or not, there will be the same distribution with just more coin for everyone

Quote from: reRaise on April 06, 2014, 09:31:45 AM

Quote from: Amph on April 06, 2014, 07:51:23 AM

bitcoin was instamined too stop the butthurt about instamine

bad launch time plus ninja launch is far worse than any instamined coin with ANN

Well instamine is a broad word, he is saying that in darks case it was almost instantly

it doesn't matter, if the coin had not been launched at such bad time(5 am gmt LOL)

Oh so the plot thickens now.... it launched at 5am gmt too, and amph a dark supporter admits that's not an idea time for Europe and US. Well i had not mentioned that on this thread regarding darkcoin yet.

Come on amph please be more serious.... you have to realise that launching a coin with idea instamin params like drk had and confirmed by the block explorer WITH A COMPILED WINDOWS QT is a SCAM. It is equally as bad as having a huge premine. There is really no difference and actually it is worse because the dev gets a HUGE % of the coins, and also takes all the EASY coins away from miners.

A big instamine is worse than a big premine it is a double whammy to the miners

this is because it was combined with a bad launch time, if the launch time was actually fair(like 17 gmt) everyone would have mined it, and if everyone can mine it at launch i really don't see a problem with instamine

So let me get a clear statement from you ... just yes or no is okay.

IS IT OKAY FOR DEVS TO INSTAMINE THEIR COIN WITH NO COMPETITION FROM WINDOWS MINERS BECAUSE THEY DO NOT RELEASE A WINDOWS QT? YES OR NO? IT REALLY IS THAT SIMPLE TO ANSWER.

NO

I fully agree with you that NO it is not okay for a dev to instamine their own coin with no competition from windows users that they cut out by launching without a windows QT.

After going back and reading the dark coin launch thread over again is so obviously a planned and perfectly executed instamine.

instamine is ok as long as there is competition, and not just one person doing it

so the answer is no obv

LOL that's the very point, instamine where devs hit the instamine button right after launch on a normal launch is bad enough because everyone else is downloading, virus scanning , conf file, bat file ... by the time they have finished they devs have scooped up a huge amount of the loot. You know this for sure because you are always early on the chains i see you on nearly every launch complaining about KGW because you want a crack at instamining yourself. Which is fine since everyone else will have the same chance as you.

However dark coin dev went a step further, he decided to stop a HUGE amount of people mining at launch by deciding to launch without a windows QT ?

SO AGAIN

IS IT OKAY FOR A DEV TO LAUNCH A COIN AND START INSTAMINING IT HIMSELF AND NOT RELEASE A WINDOWS QT FOR THE MAJORITY OF USERS TO BE ABLE TO MINE? YES OR NO?

i'm with you in this, no complain here and answer is no

qt should always be released for everyone with a pass protection