Quote from: LoyceV on Today at 09:03:35 AM

Judging by the activity of the Bounties (Altcoins) board, the token spam is still very profitable.

I do not know if it is very profitable but it seems to be highly active in that board. If scammers cast a wide net and manage to pull in just one or two victims from thousands of potentials, then it means they will keep doing it in the hope of increasing numbers.

Quote from: LoyceV on Today at 09:03:35 AM

The real problem, in my opinion, is that most "investors" don't care what they're investing in. Ever since 2017 it struck me as weird that the simplest idea tries to raise $100 million, and none of the investors seems to realize that's enough money to buy thousands of luxory cars.

Those days of 2017/2018 are over, only a tiny minority of fundraiser projects will be able to sell coins and tokens to make millions of USD$ for themselves now.

Quote from: LoyceV on Today at 09:03:35 AM

Being anonymous isn't necessarily bad. I'm more or less anonymous, and so are you. Most Mods too, and so is Satoshi. That's fine with me.

It is fine with me too until the point I invest in a project, at that point I want to know who I am dealing with.

Anonymity does not have to be necessarily bad, I agree with that statement but in the end if investors or potential investors want to know the names of the full team behind his Casino Critique project it should be disclosed. If for some reason they do not want to disclose the names they really should disclose the real reasons why they are refusing to disclose the names of the people behind their project.