Blah blah, and we're back to defining what a win and a loss means for both sides. Already 20% of Ukraine are set not to just go under RU's sphere of influence but will become RU!
And no, it doesn't "become RU". That's not how it works.
Especially the fact that after retreat from Kharkiv oblast it already not like 20 %. A little bit less, around 12-15 %/
7 months of ''special operation'' and now Russia announced mobilization third time (After WWI and WWII). Everything is going fine. But why the hell it was needed if according to Russian data they have just about 6000 troops killed? Where are these 200k troops who went to this war initially? You're planning to take Ukraine with quantity, but quality also matters. I think there is big difference between contract army which was prepared for this ''operation'' and transcripts without experience in war and questionable motivation.
You're not doing very well with your future predictions. I hope I don't have to remind about 9th May parade in Kyiv.
As I know, russians will not train their conscripted "mobiks" because they have only one NATO-standard polygon - in Mulino.