Quote from: watuba on April 06, 2014, 08:20:01 PM

Quote from: Kai Proctor on April 06, 2014, 07:46:04 PM

Quote from: TanteStefana on April 06, 2014, 07:41:00 PM

Quote from: LimLims on April 06, 2014, 07:10:58 PM

I actually think the logo's purpose is somewhat deeper. One aspect that I believe is crucial to Darkcoin's survival (once source is released) is remaining competitive against a carefully branded clone that intentionally avoids any of the "Dark" baggage. If we were to go open source right now I believe we'd be wide open to being completely dominated by a "light"-branded clone with strong marketing. Look at how well Hirocoin did in mere weeks, and it doesn't even have Darksend. Selecting an accessible, mainstream logo that avoids any dark connotations and doing some major work on branding reduces the scope for this.

I agree 100%.

I'm glad you all have veto power.

The coin is named Darkcoin, you might as well embrace it some flowers next to a colorful "D" will change nothing. Grin

There is some merit to this. If you look at Tesla for example. Green energy companies have been notoriously unsuccessful, mostly do to a very saturated market, with tons of green energy companies touting how cool it is to be green. Tesla just took it to the extreme, and said green is just so so so cool. Their logo and everything fully embraces the coolness. The thing is, there are like 100s of cryptos right now that are purely going for "cool", and I think the better way to monopolize a part of the market, would be to retain the cool, but go for something more specific and trustworthy. This again, should be based on the developers specific vision for the coin.

Then again I find the #6 b&w logo simple and sophisticated, I fail to see "coolness" as in "look we are so edgy". But beyond the design there are the qualities of the coin, coins with a wonderful design may fail in that aspect, however, I believe that Darkcoin has everything it takes to succeed.