Quote from: cryptohunter on April 06, 2014, 10:00:28 PM

Quote from: flipme on April 06, 2014, 08:53:37 PM

Yeah, lets get back to X11
Here are the facts, just in case:

- half the electricity consumption
- optimized mining software from different development branches
- ASIC safe for now
- most modern concept
- state of the art coins (DARKCOIN - HIROCOIN)
- probably more coins of value switching over to it

X11 is per se a warrant for quality and value of a coin's core.
It was made by the creme de la creme of the coin developers.
The market performance reflects it. People just trust the concept.

2 scam coins both use it? that's it's claim to fame?

again your facts are just your statements backed by nothing... probably, state of the art, for now, half the electricity = vague and not clear.... is it half the electricity of QRK , Groestl ?

besides you missed these questions again??

1. is it more efficient than qrk? Are cats more efficient than dogs? No definition here so I'm answering to the best of my ability
2. is it more secure than qrk? 83% more secure, your definition is undefined so I've provided my own
3. is it more efficient than scrypt? or is the miner just crippled and can't use the full potential of the card?Scrypt utilizes RAM heavily. The power savings is manifested through not being memory hard. So yes, more power efficient than Scrypt in the sense that the algorithms themselves are designed to use the GPU core rather than the GPU memory.
4. are there more efficient miners already out for x11 that are more optimised? Are there more efficient scrypt kernels running for cgminer? Yes, but not by more than a couple percent. Same here with x11
5. is it more asic resistant that qrk? Yes, in the sense that someone has to spend the extra time to hash 5 extra functions that quark doesn't have. Dont bring back to me the pseudo-random choice based on the if/else statement.
6. is it more asic resistant that scyptN , scrypt jane Scrypt N is different that Scrypt Jane. I can tell you that it's more asic resistant than Scrypt-N because I've already seen advertisements for scrypt ASICs saying that the Scrypt parameters are configurable.
7. is it x12, x13, x99 going to be better? will we need to fork all of the coins over and over again?Not sure where you're going here. Are you asking if something better will come along? Shit yeah something will most definitely be around that is a better solution in year 3056.

Your questions are designed to be completely loaded, sir. If you want people to stop being so hostile then perhaps you should attempt at engaging rather than presenting yourself as hostile. Else, you will be dismissed .. based on the entire thread of dismissive arguments.

From what I see, you don't want actual answers . . and want only to see shit. Nobody can help you understand if that's all you want.