Quote from: stomachgrowls on September 16, 2022, 07:52:17 PM

If we dont talk technically about those hacks on coding manner and simply just the casino had been abused through those bonuses and promotions then it does only signify that they arent doing up their

job on which it would really be just normal that the team should really be setting out specific rules and conditions for those bonuses.It would be normal for a business to do so because if they do just

let loose in terms of those mechanics and wager requirement or something related to this then it would really be just ending up on getting abused which is normal
since there are people who would really be finding a way.

Well there is something that I would like to highlight, to enter the internal algorithm of a casino in a game is something too difficult, online it can be done, but it has to be integrated into an Intranet, and I think that the filters would detect an entry, the encryption can be changed if you get the administrator benefits to make changes, at least this is what I have managed to see when it comes to a code within a casino, and more when it is fully encrypted in the blockchain, technically that seems to me to be something very difficult to do, but it is not impossible either, if there is complicity in a casino I think it is very possible, however the internal security in the algorithms is very strong.

Quote from: FanEagle on Today at 01:53:20 AM

Quote from: rhomelmabini on September 28, 2022, 04:06:07 PM

Quote from: Lucasgabd on September 27, 2022, 10:27:28 PM

unfortunately that is probably the case more often than not
that's why KYC policies are not the ultimate solution and can even be harmful by incentivizing a parallel market for people's documents.

That's an alarming thing tbh, for just a cent people are willing to provide a dangerous stuff here. I think there should be more verification process other than KYC that can implement more stricter rules towards account but if that happens I think users are the one that will elusive for such a site or a casino.

Unfortunately KYC does cause a lot of people to leave, because there are other alternatives that doesn't ask KYC at all. I would say that even if you asked for a video of that person, they would just pay for it and get the video as well.

I am sure that weekly image requesting would be terrible for many people and they wouldn't want that and leave as well so it would be a terrible request as well. All in all there isn't a solution to this where you have a certain guarantee that it’s the same person but also keep every single gambler here as well. Either you lose gamblers or you let it be and do not care what others are doing to get that KYC.

Well that is an option that I would run to anyone, rather I would focus on that KYC can be required when there is suspicion of some activity, or something that indicates that it may be wrong, there if you have the right to ask, of otherwise a photo + video request is something that can be exaggerated, unless a very high withdrawal of money can also be requested, and that as a security measure, but it should not be such a radical KYC, I would not see it so badly It is a matter of doing it as much as possible, precisely so that it does not bother customers, the greatest success of a casino will always be in its players.