Quote from: Little Mouse on Today at 03:03:29 PM

Regarding the 5 sold Chips, it depends on escrow again. If there's no escrow, there will be no fund from outside invested in the project.

I'm not sure my question was answered or if I just didn't understand. Whoever bought those 5 chips (in addition to the people who received giveaway chips) are still going to be sharing in a revenue pool or not? I just wanted to clarify that they are or aren't, regardless of how much money is raised.

Quote from: JollyGood on Today at 06:24:49 PM

I would agree. Even if the amounts being held at the moment are miniscule it is irrelevant because it is inconceivable under any circumstances that people not associated with a project can still have access to any funds. What could be causing delays to them making an announcement?

I've never used or been part of a 2-of-3 signature wallet, but I think I'd be correct in assuming that if one or more individuals no longer want to be responsible for signing transactions for that wallet, they'd have to relinquish control over their part, correct? Would I be mistaken to assume that those two escrow agents who've left the project have already handed over what amounts to full access over the Casino Critique wallet to someone else?

I'm just asking here, because I admit I don't understand fully how things are being carried out behind the scenes. And assuming the escrow issue gets taken care of, and it's only 0.005BTC we're talking about at the moment....the day may yet be saved as far as regaining transparency and/or trust. It'd be much, much worse if the team had thousands of dollars in their account--but I think if you're claiming to be "100% honest" (that was the original slogan), the more communication the better.