Quote from: Lucasgabd on September 23, 2022, 10:40:15 PM

Quote from: suzanne5223 on September 21, 2022, 05:50:16 PM

Quote from: LUCKMCFLY on September 20, 2022, 10:42:16 PM

Quote from: suzanne5223 on September 06, 2022, 11:47:21 AM

There are some casino that has already integrated Monero as a payment method before the compliance risk which led to the delisting of Monero on some tier 1 exchanges and the integration of Monero can still happen in some casinos. However, it's going to be 1 out of 10 casinos because of any form of anonymous deposit or withdrawal against casino Master license holder rules and regulations.

Yes, and I really like that integration in the event that it happens, because not everyone will do it, perhaps for fear that they might give them even more follow-up? I'm not very sure, but the SEC may be able to get in there, I think that the current KYC requirements that are so demanding, both for casinos and exchanges, is for that same action, to be able to do follow-ups, so they don't use Monero, because I've seen As an exchange as prestigious as Binance, they have surrendered to the is of many governments and authorities of some countries and have blocked many users of the exchange, including the blocking of some user funds that those governments considered suspicious, this is good for users. which are bad actually, but Monero makes the transactions more private, and more anonymous, I think that would make it more difficult for the authorities to trace them. I think that may be a compelling reason today.

The SEC doing some follow-up is the reason why I said if we're going to count 1-10 the casinos that will make use of XMR in the future it will be only 1 casino which believe may be created by a privacy focus project.
The exchange like Binance has to surrender to the authorities because it's never a DEX, to begin with, but I'm surprised that they never delist Monero.
Having said that, I just want people to understand that no matter how we like privacy and no KYC for huge withdrawals on casinos since Cryptocurrency is the talk worldwide we will never escape the KYC aspect except if a privacy focus project creates a no KYC casino but if we consider the risk involved it doesn't worth it.

I think this trend will continue and probably get more extreme in the future
governments sanctioning privacy tools and people having to find alternatives if they care about privacy
it won't be different with online casinos.

Yes, and that's where we have to assume that if things aren't done that way, then it doesn't make sense, that is, the casinos have to side with the players, in the future there will be many problems that have to do with privacy, the dangers will be imminent and no one likes to leave their data on platforms that can be easily hacked and that do not offer them any type of backup, if this is so, if people do not play more in casinos they would simply fail, so it will become something very complicated, because there will be casinos that go against all KYC, and of all lack of identification, let's not be surprised that casinos with 0 KYC will come out.

Quote from: lienfaye on Today at 12:55:27 AM

Quote from: goaldigger on October 09, 2022, 09:48:23 PM

Quote from: crzy on October 09, 2022, 09:19:43 PM

Quote from: erep on October 09, 2022, 09:03:48 PM

Quote from: Mate2237 on October 09, 2022, 08:34:04 PM

snip
Government pressurized casino companies to use KYC because the security. Many gamblers use different information in the process of registering KYC. There are sometimes the information used in the site is different from the DOCUMENTS provided for the prove of ownership. That is where the problem is always escalating.

Government regulations have pressured every casino to add an obligation to complete KYC on the terms and conditions, these regulations are based on security and money laundering prevention, but users expect the anonymity factor to be increased so that they do not agree to use KYC even though they do not commit money laundering crimes and others. But there is no other choice if using a centralized gambling platform because it is guided by government regulations.

Many are requiring level 1 KYC first but sooner or later they will surely ask for another KYC which requires the supporting documents and that is because of the regulations which is already beyond the control of any gambling site. If you are still not ok with the KYC, better to use other platform for now but don’t stay your money on any site because they can implement KYC even without informing you.

This is actually what happened to Roobet before, I remember they implement KYC without announcing it and the gamblers left with no choice but to comply or else they will not access their money, though it’s only a level 1 KYC but doing that without announcing is something not good. Well, it happened years ago and I don’t think it’s still an issue here. Regulations will always win, the government have its own way to regulate casinos, and KYC is one thing.

Yes the level 1 kyc implementation is so sudden. But as you can see many gamblers still comply and chose to stay, not only those who have funds on their account but the gamblers who trusted Roobet as a reliable casino. As you have pointed out the Government have ways to regulate the casinos and it's inevitable for them to continue to operate. Thus it's up to us if we will comply or will stay away.

This is very true, in casinos we have the complete freedom to choose the one we want, but when choosing it we know that they all have their own rules or laws, and due to the requirements to maintain their authenticity and licenses, they require KYC is something that escapes so much. from the hands of the casino as well as from us, we all know the ances that governments have to put the s mnaos in the crypto world, and they know that casinos handle a lot of money, if they do not meet certain standards it is likely that the casino will be put in danger, a government or a command entity does not care about the life of a casino or a company, they only want their share of the money, and one way they find is through regulations, rules, KYC, it is a tactic.

Quote from: bitterguy28 on Today at 01:38:53 AM

Quote from: Scripture on October 09, 2022, 11:21:23 PM

Quote from: Slow death on October 09, 2022, 11:00:15 PM

Most people would agree that KYC was inevitable, but the most worrying and shocking thing here is that the casino is anonymous (it is located in an uncertain part) and the owner of the casino is anonymous, the license of the casino is from a country where the laws are lenient or in certain cases, they don't even have a license, so this same casino asks customers to KYC (deliver their precious documents) to remember that when doing KYC the person delivers an identity document and proof of address, that is, the owner of the anonymous casino is knowing where every customer lives in detail but the customer has never seen the casino owner's face and doesn't even know where the heck the casino is located, so what part of that is fair?

Is the team of Roobet remain anonymous? I’m not following this project for a long time though I manage to participate on their contest and I can say that once you deal with Roobet, you have no choice but to comply with their KYC requirement or else you can’t access your account. If KYC is a requirement, I also agree that the site should also disclose their information, this can also help to at least give peace of mind for the gamblers.

If you manage to participate in events recently then yeah you need to comply with their KYC as this was strictly implemented earlier last year but if you happen to join or play in the past? nope their KYC requirement is only for those under questioned and not mandatory , I have been playing and joining event for many times even before and yes there are no strict kyc back then.
but about the info of each account? I'm sure that this will remain safe and private as this will only runs from the team and the players involved.

I understand that many people question KYC, but you have to remember something, in every casino, new or old, there will always be a KYC requirement, this is something that will be normal and that will be for all casinos, for me I already know I see normal, also sometimes as players we want something and then we complain, that is, sometimes when casinos do not have certain licenses, we say that it is important, that licenses are needed to be able to trust completely, when there are licenses and they require KYC then we get upset, and yes, there are reasons, but if they don't demand that, they won't be in compliance with the law, and they could sanction the casino, or even close it, sometimes we must accept certain demands, and we are all free to play in casinos Our favorites, in the case of Robbet, it has always shown its great commitment to players, and it is reliable and has a great reputation, for me that is enough, of course, there are more demanding customers, but the trend is always It will go in that direction.