Quote from: Wind_FURY on Today at 12:39:19 PM

Quote from: Oshosondy on October 11, 2022, 06:32:41 AM

Where is your evidence? But even if having evidence, why fake KYC? You have your money with a gambling site and you prefer to use fake KYC, what would happen last? It could bounce on you in a way you won't be favoured when the gambling site knows that you are manipulating with fake KYC.

I read the trust comments given to him, and one of them had a link referencing to a post by Stunna replying to OP. He said that OP sent them four attempts for KYC to verify his identity, and each KYC verification attempt had four DIFFERENT identities used. Hahaha.

Quote from: Maasdamer on October 11, 2022, 04:42:08 PM

Match fixing yes or no, we did not see any proof for that, only words from a stake representative.

There must be solid proof these matches were fixed, otherwise what's the discussion?

What's the names of the players, which tournament? There should be a public record of that.

KYC is a whole other story, first the match fixing thing should be proven with solid evidence. If there is no evidence there was no reason to not pay him in the first place.

It's probably true that OP's knowledge or non-knowledge on match fixing can't be proven, but the casino decided to ask for KYC because of the change in his/her betting patterns. Why did OP try to use four different identities, which has given the casino a reason to believe that none of them is his/her real identity.

It's really illegal to use other people's identities, especially using their identification cards to comply with the KYC. That is clearly a form of cheating and Op might have been doing that thing for a long time. He should have been honest and just submit his own details. The casino site has the right to ban him or not to respond to his claims because he has a serious violation.