Quote from: yahoo62278 on October 17, 2022, 06:04:28 PM

Quote from: PaperWallet on October 17, 2022, 05:07:05 PM

Quote from: LoyceV on July 20, 2022, 06:11:14 PM

Quote from: BitcoinGirl.Club on July 20, 2022, 05:41:18 PM

You may start a new campaign and offer rewards again. We can request Royse777 to escrow the reward. 🤣

Lol

OP is pissed he didn't get the supported he hoped for in his many posts about FortuneJack.

To answer OP's question: I think the DT-members who wanted to tag Royse777 have done it by now.

So you were wrong

I don't think they were wrong really. We all were trying to give Royse the benefit of doubt. Most don't feel like they were out to intentionally scam and were actually scammed themselves. Given their previous reputation we wanted to "give a pass" so to speak. Some of us had more questions we wanted answered, partially to get the whole truth and partially to see if there was anything left out, but it wasn't intended to be an all out attack. The way some things were answered with massive attitude or with a hint of keeping secrets just made more questions come up.

Bottom line, do we think Royse is a scammer in the sense he/she would steal your money? I honestly want to say no, but all this hiding and trying to collect money for casino critique while hiding whom you actually are makes me want to rethink that. Why not be honest? I'm not gonna tag them, but I do not fully trust them and haven't since the whole drama started. I think I was justified to add them to my ~list.

I understand. So the new tags were not really about the BitLucy scam and do not count towards the number of tags mentioned in the question of this thread, so viewed this way yes LoyceV was not in fact wrong, because new elements have emerged since then