DireWolfM14, I've exhausted extensive efforts to resolve this directly with Fatman.
Put simply I've given him every chance but find him to be a very dishonest individual. If we are to invoke 'discord discussions' there will be lengthy submissions including several verifiable instances of Fatman's dishonesty which including his actions under the alias 'Namtaf Arret' and other instances. The terms are abundantly clear, including the fact that a decision in any dispute should be on the sole basis of the terms themselves. As noted here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5413494.msg60963629#msg60963629It is plainly inappropriate that (FatMan) would seek any post-facto debate, submissions or alterations in respect of the terms, and/or to potentially seek to impose the same on the escrow providers.
I also believe it is unfair on the escrow providers to draw them into any debate or further submissions whatsoever other than the application of the original terms.
DireWolfM14 please make your decision as instructed by the terms without taking consideration for any aspects other than the terms themselves.
I don't think there's any utility in bringing personal squabbles here. I also believe your actions are in bad faith (eg. recording the public bet discussion for context, attempting to exploit a loophole, and then blocking the review of that very context to inform interpretation of the final terms because you believe it will be advantageous to you), but there's no need for me to rehash all of that.
Your "extensive efforts to resolve" consisted of demanding money that you are not owed, which would not be correct of me to concede to.
The arbitration process is quite straightforward. You submit your interpretation and why it's correct, I submit mine, and the arbitrator makes a verdict. I have encouraged the use of this process throughout. I have also attempted to iron out the specifics of the process (deciding who to use etc.) in private to no avail.
Please decide who you would like to use as an arbitrator (DW, DW & zazarb, or a panel of three, or some other option you see fit). We can take it from there. I have no strong preference as I'm certain any reasonable, neutral party will come to the same verdict.