Quote from: BitcoinGirl.Club on October 22, 2022, 10:59:46 AM

Do you think the red feedback left by JollyGood, Lauda are actually justified?

Lauda has done a lot in terms of suppressing spam (and scam) on this forum, it certainly cannot be ignored. as far as I remember, for some time I removed her from my trust list almost on a monthly basis, only to add her again after a while. in the end, she took tagging on the forum too personally, so she cast a shadow over all the previous good she had done.
About Jollygood, it reminds me a lot of Lauda's behaviour if we talk about regularity and too easy giving a red tag. (the mystery is why they are afraid to leave neutral feedback)
all experienced members already know that his feedback can be harsh, so I believe that most of them take them with a grain of salt. Although it is opposed to the trust system, because it should facilitate user recognition, and if the additional experience is needed to understand it then its power decreases.

Quote from: BitcoinGirl.Club on October 23, 2022, 08:43:20 AM

Against JollyGood this is not the first complaint but not going to the last one too.

It seems to me that I have seen JG change his feedback more often after a complaint than Lauda did.

Quote from: JollyGood on October 23, 2022, 03:40:04 PM

My apologies for not replying earlier, I had you on my ignore list and skipped past the thread. When I did read it I decided to not comment straight away until I had ample time.
..

I'm glad you've come here, I guess the mentions helped you hear this discussion in spite of your ignoring OP. I would suggest that you consider the possibility of using neutral tags, not everything can be either black or white.
maybe you can use something like [Script] BitcoinTalk User Notes. That way you will have additional information about users, and you will not burden others with it. To be honest, nobody cares who is on your (or anyone's) ignore list, there is no need to inform us about it on the user's trust page.