Quote from: albert0bsd on Today at 09:42:53 PM

Quote from: Jolly Jocker on Today at 07:36:12 PM

..it depends on the CPU used... I have 3GHz/core... be happy, the faster the better!
but the forum is not for saying "who can run faster"

it's about innovation, ideas to shorten the search... new ways in the programming..

My CPU is core i5 @ 2.6 GHz.

Anyway if it is about innovation your code doesn't have any of them.

Your way is not the shorten way, and also is not a new way of programing.

You did not reply my question

Your way:
WIF->Private Key->Publickey->Sha256->rmd160->Address.

Why not only?
Publickey->Sha256->rmd160

Skipping the WIF to privatekey and the rmd160 to address you can save a lot of process and speed up your search up to 200% or more... Trust me I already pass for that process.

What I'm trying to write, is that you can do it better, what stop you from that slow speed? You can get a better performance from your current hardware

you didn't understand the principle of this code.. the wifi key plays a big role.. i shortened the ramdon area to be searched... i also have other codes... that don't do these steps... but one need to search larger area...

example of how it works: x (6 letters) is the random area

key_WIF01 = 'KwDiBf89QgGbjEhKnhXJuH7LrciVrZi3qZUL' + x + '1111111111'
L.append(key_WIF01)
key_WIF02 = 'KwDiBf89QgGbjEhKnhXJuH7LrciVrZi3qZUM' + x + '1111111111'
L.append(key_WIF02)
key_WIF03 = 'KwDiBf89QgGbjEhKnhXJuH7LrciVrZi3qZUN' + x + '1111111111'
L.append(key_WIF03)