Quote from: Z-tight on October 23, 2022, 07:14:06 PM

Murat has posted that address first before the other member's in your post, so that doesn't make them Murat's alt, i can go to Theymos' profile or that of LoyceV and copy their address and post it somewhere in the forum, but they posted it first and so it does not make me any of them.

It really doesn't make sense for someone to want to sacrifice their own account using someone else's wallet address. Because Sergio Red didn't have any problems before and ended up getting banned after getting reports the account was connected to Kpcian.

Likewise with Kpcian, of course it is impossible to sacrifice his account for the umpteenth time after getting the first Red trust by TwitchySeal on 2016-10-01

And get the next Red Trust on 2018-04-21 by yahoo62278 and on 2018-04-22 by The Pharmacist.

Meanwhile, Sergio Red and Kpcian used the wallet address on February 01, 2018 That means long before they get Red trust.

What you should know is that Kpcian is not a Newbie ranking account.
If it was a cheat that sacrificed his account, of course they wouldn't sacrifice an account that was much bigger than the rank that was sacrificed.

Quote from: KingsDen on October 23, 2022, 07:24:18 PM

The administrator does not choose who will be on DT1 or DT2. The trust system is decentralized, that is to say it's in the hands of me and you.

Thank you for the information. Maybe I don't understand this concept.

Quote from: KingsDen on October 23, 2022, 07:24:18 PM

If you think Murat doesn't need to be on DT, you can distrust him and you could be lucky others may also ; If this happens, next week Murat might not be on DT and by then you will win the battle. Grin

I don't think it's a matter of winning the battle or not, but a matter of trust. Of course, DT's reputation must come first. How could a sinful judge punish another person?

Quote from: NeuroticFish on Today at 07:53:33 AM

It's not the first time Murat is accused of doing shady things in bounty campaigns. But from accusation to being real there's still a big step.

This is also one of the reasons I raised him as a fraud in the bounty campaign. Of course he will say the same reason every time the bounty is finished if he doesn't pay the participant.

Quote from: NotATether on Today at 08:10:09 AM

Have you asked Murat to publicly comment about this before throwing a conundrum in town square? If not, go do that first.

Is it a must?
If he's an honest person, why did he delete the bounty list? Why didn't he reject the participant's articles and videos with the list still in the spreadsheets?

Quote from: lovesmayfamilis on Today at 08:45:32 AM

This is not the first accusation of this manager; I also observed many violations on his part. Today, only one member of DT1 trusts him, which makes Murat appear on the lists of DT2.

In this case, of course, I asked DT members for help. If only one DT member believed him, of course it raised further questions.

Quote from: BitcoinGirl.Club on Today at 09:44:21 AM

If someone does not have balls to speak from their own identity then they are hypocrite.

That is not important. Because this is not an opportunity to reveal identity. There are many people who do their job honestly in this forum without us knowing their identity.