Quote from: lhrbeijing on Today at 06:25:00 AM

Haha, many people use the word control when talking about the CCP, why can't it be a kind of protection?

BTC is an innocuous tech, there may be a few drawbacks, but so are there in paper money and essentially in everything people use on earth, i know of the claims of enviromental protection, money laundering, high risks and all, but most of these allegations against BTC are lies, and some are not caused by BTC in itself, but people who use it, i don't see a reason to protect people from BTC.

Quote from: lhrbeijing on Today at 06:25:00 AM

So does monitoring of classified communications around the world count as control by some agency in the United States?
Isn't the US protecting its so-called national security?

That has to do with politics and is very different from BTC which has no affiliation to politics. If the US feels doing that protects their national security, then what threat is BTC to China's national security that caused a ban on it, none, that is why this is very different from China's BTC ban. BTC only threatens their control of people's money, and that should not be a threat in a free world.

Quote from: lhrbeijing on Today at 06:25:00 AM

Some people say that the wealth accumulated by an individual should be in the sun.
In other words, there is no fear of being investigated by financial institutions if it is legal property.
It doesnt matter if you dont use Bitcoin to maintain your anonymity. What do you think?

Governments should freely allow people make their choice on that.