Quote from: cryptohunter on April 07, 2014, 05:43:56 PM

Quote from: TanteStefana on April 07, 2014, 05:43:20 PM

Quote from: Scriptiee on April 07, 2014, 05:38:13 PM

Can we please stop replying to that complete waste of time? This white knight for all the "scammed and miserable" ...

All it does is fuels his desire to be centre of the attention.

Does he do it often? LOL, then I'm wrong and he's an idiot, what can I say? I always hope for the best, especially if I lost my temper, 'cause then I feel so bad........

I'm 17 soon i am not a kid.

Also it's going to be a petition not a vote.

I will simply put an honest account of darkcoins history. A solution to compensate people cut out from mining. And make a petition. If a lot of people sign. Then though sheer TRUTH SPREADING alone a lot of pressure can be applied.

Anyway i need to finish my game now.

The last of us - such a great game has anyone played it?

Ah yes. But you are very young and I don't think you comprehend what that would do to the coin. Please consider this:

1. many people have paid a lot of money for coin, with the statistics laid out before them. They knew of the history of the coin, yet they decided to buy anyway. So they took into consideration the history of the coin and the future total number of coins that will be mined. You want them to accept a short term increase of 33% of the total number of coins mined this year, decreasing the value a minimum of 30%, but likely to crash the market and kill the coin. Look at what the "airdrop" for Auroracoin did. People collected the coins and cashed them out right away, not caring that the price was crashing, they were getting something for nothing. It is human nature, and I'm sorry, but at 17 you will still be idealistic, blindly so if you don't see this coming.

2. Doing this would remove all trust in this coin. People would feel the developer is untrustworthy, changing the game at the drop of a hat. I argued against changing the number of coins to be mined, not just because I thought a larger number of coins was good for the usefulness of the coin, but because I didn't want things mucked with. I think stability is important. But since it actually increased the future value of the coin due to making it more scarce, it was overwhelmingly supported. But remember, people will always vote themselves more money, it's human nature. It's why a democracy can never work and why the United States is a Republic. Until they understand the consequences. Unfortunately, the masses have other things on their minds than to dig in deep enough to make a wise decision. That's why we're always in financial trouble Cheesy

I'm very glad you've become interested in cryptocurrency. In a few years, you will have a good understanding of economics if you keep up with it.