Quote from: Sarah Azhari on Today at 02:26:37 AM

I still learn how to use it, thank you for your advance.
where I can find that link?

I would advise you to not use any tools for faster reporting until you have more experience with reports and until you get the better feeling of which posts are breaking forum rules and should be removed.

Quote from: Mpamaegbu on Today at 09:39:22 AM

I believe we're dealing with a hypothetical situation there, thus why I underlined that part. However, let me throw realism into it and ask "isn't that the right thing to do if mods feel a report is bad, to ignore it?" It's like raising a false alarm and the police gets there, realizes it calls for no concern. The police turns and leaves. The one that should be horrible is when it's marked as good report on a bad post and no action is taken on it, isn't it? Is there anything I'm misplacing here?

As Pmalek said, there should be some consequences for a bad report otherwise mods would be flooded, but they are already doing something similar to what you suggested via unhandled reports that can be sometimes seen as "soft bad". So, when mods are not sure how to act on a report, instead of flagging it "bad" they will just leave it as unhandled indefinitely as those reports don't affect percentage.