Quote from: JayJuanGee on Today at 12:45:20 AM

Quote from: Toxic2040 on November 07, 2022, 06:58:56 PM

Quote from: Paashaas on November 07, 2022, 06:35:21 PM

I've a new cat in the household.

Named him Sato. Satoshi --> Sato.

berry smol...and cute 😍 meow!
+1 WOsMerit

Looks mean to me. YMMV

Quote from: Biodom on November 07, 2022, 08:30:19 PM

Quote from: shahzadafzal on November 07, 2022, 08:19:30 PM

But there will be only 21,000,000 bitcoins

Or 0.002625 btc/per person

Maybe 6 bil adults, so ~0.004 per adult-plankton
10X more than average is 0.04 btc (just about $500 rn)-shrimp
100X more than average is 0.4 btc-fish
1000X is 4 btc-dolphin
10000X is 40 btc-whale
100000X is 400 btc-blue whale (i know that they posted much higher number before, but this is what I surmise the whale size account would be eventually and the prominence of whales confirms as there are about 10K-25K blue whales and 14K addresses between 100 and 1000 btc)

These depictions of the significance of these numbers seem somewhat reasonable.

You could become a whale Biodom, if you were able to double your stash.

Also, there seems to be a lot of value between a regular whale and a blue whale... I am not sure about the meaning of such. but just an interesting observation that there might be a lot of "normie" bitcoiners who entered into bitcoin in the 2012-2016 time frame who would fall within such range - that is they had happened to have been somewhat aggressive and not whimpy without being overly aggressive or making some pretty BIG trading like mistakes..

I can think of a few who might fit in or out of this range..and not even saying exactly - though I am thinking that poor widdo Searing, who had been with us so long - and who was pretty strongly in solid arenas of this territory is neither no longer with us, and may well had not been able to use his coins... sure it would be nice to be wrong in this speculation of mine.

Does using averages, especially over the human population, make sense in that case ? Most people have 0 sat.