Quote from: BitcoinGirl.Club on Today at 09:53:49 AM

And that's where it's not clear. How would they are going to define nefarious purposes.

Well, that's the thing. Anyway they want to. It's up to them to decide if what the player does is nefarious. Accepting the terms means agreeing to all of them. And one of the points is that they can close an account for any reason they want. It's bullshit, it's wrong, but hey, gamblers decided that traditional fiat casinos weren't good enough. In that case, enjoy the "safe wild wild west" of crypto gambling. Since OP's account got locked, it's safe to assume that his use of multiple accounts was considered as nefarious.

Quote from: BitcoinGirl.Club on Today at 09:53:49 AM

If all looks correct then why would a user will create more than one account at all?

There aren't many valid reasons to be honest. One I can think of is if you lose access to your 1st account or you get it hacked and you can no longer gamble from it. If the associated email is gone as well, you will have no way to recover it. Maybe the support can help, but who knows? Creating a new account in this case would be a justified reason.

Quote from: Lak93xy on Today at 12:23:45 PM

I partly agree with you here. BUT, second line says "We reserve the right to disable accounts that have been created with the intention to abuse our bonus, coupon and chat features".

So while they start off with using the generic "nefarious purposes", they go into more detail what they exactly mean with that.

No, I don't think that's what it means. I don't think that second part cancels out the previous one. They go into more details regarding the reasons why accounts can be locked, and that's where they mention bonus abuse and those other examples. But the restriction for creating accounts for "nefarious purposes" is still there.

Quote from: Lak93xy on Today at 12:23:45 PM

Furthermore regarding sportsbetting, they do have this line i pointed out before

Quote from: Lak93xy on November 07, 2022, 12:07:18 AM

Also, I just found this:

Quote

"3.26. In case of suspicion of unfair activity, Sportsbook platform reserves the right to void any bet or any part of it, thus making the questionable bet invalid (in these cases, the payout is made with odds of 1) or suspend any withdrawals for up to 31 calendar days."

That's got nothing to do with your case. That's about things like match fixing, wrong odds, open markets for betting when they should be closed, etc. Let's say you are watching a football match and a team scores a goal, but the betting provider fails to close the markets in time due to human error, and that allows you to still submit bets in a situation where the result has changed and all betting should be disabled. If that happened, the casino would have the right to cancel and void such bets.

I don't think you should have used your accounts in this way. Btw, have you reached out to Rollbit's forum account and informed them to comment in this thread? I think you should do that. I am also going to tag LoyceV in this post. I like the way he thinks and how he analyzed some other situations in the past involving scams and abuses. @LoyceV, whenever you get a chance...