Quote from: Don Pedro Dinero on Today at 05:55:58 AM

I find the debate very interesting from the sidelines, as I have never used Chipmixer, but I think there are two people missing from the debate here, one is franky1, who I have read an opinion similar to nutildah's, and against the majority. The other would be o_e_l_e_o, of the opposing view.

It would be curious, paradoxical, if a tool like Chipmixer, which is used for privacy, would end up putting you in the bull's eye as Nutildah or franky1 (and to certain extent Ognasty as well) suggest.

I'll stay tuned to the debate.

Obviously they're tracking people who use it. Using a mixer for privacy is like buying drugs with cash and posting video of the transaction on YouTube because you think you're safe since the transaction isn't trackable. It will only bring more eyes upon you. The government even came out and said they can track mixed coins through chipmixer over a certain amount. It provides about as much privacy as a bank robber who runs out screaming along with all the customers in the bank after the robbery, only a majority of the customers are also bank robbers... Not to mention it's centralized and not at all how privacy should be occurring on the Bitcoin blockchain. If anything, people thinking tools like this are good enough may even take away funds from developers who could actually achieve privacy on Bitcoin's blockchain via real development and not a centralized shell game.