Quote from: LoyceV on Today at 08:39:56 AM

Quote from: Rollbit Razer on Today at 12:03:53 AM

For example, match fixing is a very genuine threat to any site that operates a sportsbook. Should this mean every site operating a sportsbook should shut down?

Were the users guilty of match fixing? If so, where's the evidence? And also: why does that lead to "limited" accounts instead of banned accounts? Is fixing matches with lower amounts acceptable?

Quote

Considering abuse is a very small % of our overall volume, we don't think so. However, we certainly will take action against prolific abusers, with the hopes of deterring their future efforts.

It sounds like most users lose money, and a very small percentage of users wins. That should be normal in a casino, instead of a reason to take their funds.

I think the point is being missed here, the user is permanently banned from Rollbit for circumventing our bans and previous account limits. Some of these accounts were detailed in my original reply, one with a remarkably similar name to OP's username on this forum. Those aren't just hunches, they're backed by our internal measures for detecting accounts evading our limits & bans, further backed by blockchain transactions that I disclosed.

If they did not create additional accounts for the purposes of abusing our Sportsbook, they would not be banned and be permitted to continue on their limited account. The fact is they require the open limits to abuse the sportsbook so seek to circumvent our limits.

We're more than happy to show additional data points from our end as long as they're not sensitive or disclose our internal security practises, making it easier for abusers to circumvent our measures.

As requested, please suggest what you'd like to see, keeping in mind your suggestion that screenshots can be fabricated.