Quote from: BitcoinGirl.Club on Today at 11:50:11 AM

Whoever these three voters are, they have no idea that the number of reports I have is 16 with 89% accuracy LOL.

Oh well, I do have an idea about your reports

From here: Guess the number of report I made and reward for two highest reporter. See? If someone really wants to find an information, it can be found... More or less difficult, but it can be found...

However, I appreciate your honesty about considering it wrong to be voted at Best SpamBuster category. But I wrote that post as it intrigued me about who was igehhh talking about. As far as I see, none of the Top 3 made only 500-1000 reports...

Quote from: lovesmayfamilis on Today at 12:05:32 PM

Quote from: BitcoinGirl.Club on Today at 11:50:11 AM

I am curious how do you find the numbers. If I understand, you are using Ninjastic but how do you get the detail numbers?

If you're referring to how GazetaBitcoin found the data in the post you quoted, then I guess it doesn't take a genius. Just go through the votes of the people who made their choices, and you will see that you were given three votes.

^That + some secrets of the job to say so

-- Kidding. However, in order to be able to calculate the number of votes I have to keep an evidence... By keeping the evidence is easier to see some numbers at some point in time. I don't update all the evidence every day, but I am gathering it during the entire contest...

However, I am not sure if you asked how I managed to see how many votes were gathered so far or if you asked how I could see the numbers of reports made by various users. About the number of votes I already replied. About the number of reports -- you already know the topic with report records. And additionally, theymos posts, sometimes, statistics (in a year for the previous year) of previous year's top reporters. From there you can also make an image...

Quote from: lovesmayfamilis on Today at 12:05:32 PM

And yes, I admire the ability of Ratimov and GazetaBitcoin to create a bunch of spam reports in such a large number.

Thank you, lovesmayfamilis, for the kind words! You are one of the first which appreciated my work here... I will always remember that... (Now, as that old topic of mine came through my head, I realize that I should update it a little...)

Quote from: lovesmayfamilis on Today at 12:05:32 PM

why don't you, I think, and igehhh, since he is very much outraged by the unfairness of the elections, show your progress?

Lol abut what you said about igehhh =))) However, BitcoinGirl.Club was honest man -- and he showed his progress.

And about igehhh, it seems he just threw the words and fled the premises... Oh well, maybe he will return and explain what he meant...

Quote from: BitcoinGirl.Club on Today at 01:05:07 PM

Quote from: lovesmayfamilis on Today at 12:05:32 PM

If you're referring to how GazetaBitcoin found the data in the post you quoted, then I guess it doesn't take a genius

I highly doubt, they do it that way. It will take hours even days to check all the entries.

Once you "made your hand", to say so, it takes much less time than you think