[...]
Ahh, it might be wise to mention that the perspective I offered is more intended for Stake as they're hell bent on being sure you abuses multi-alt. Being having to stay neutral and giving benefits of doubts to every party involved, it's a way to say, "Hey, Stake, here's a possibility, have you considered it before being persistently sure that you're banning for a legit reason?"
[...]
You're right they seem to have submitted a new evidence there, but because the first one hasn't been conclusive obviously. [...]
It is conclusive, actually. The accusation of fake KYC is false as casinoguru team was able to verify thr legitimacy of the documents,
Thank you for the documents you have provided. I checked the validity of the certificate of residence and it is indeed valid.
I have checked the correct tax code and it is indeed valid, so I cannot see anything to suggest that the documents you have provided are not legitimate.
Therefore, the focus of this complaint is the links to multiple other accounts.
which prompt Stake to submit another evidence for the focus of multi-acc accusation; and, since I think OP has built quite a solid counter-evidence against it, yet Stake still insist on it, and since we have to remain neutral here, I tried to suggest a new perspective for Stake to consider, that they made a wrong conclusion of OP because he's simply dragged into the mud.